Recently in Photography Category

More on Aperture 2.0

| | TrackBacks (0)

A nice overview of the new features and changes in Aperture 2.0 by the Aperture Users Professional Network, which seems to bear out some of my own first impressions. Particularly interesting might be the plug-in API, especially if it will attract some of the PS Plug-In writers, thus obviating the need for a round-trip to PS in many circumstances.

Fraser Speirs seems to agree on the quality improvements in the RAW conversions, and has nice sample images here.

FWIW, here are some examples showing High-ISO shadow performance on a picture taken with a D70s at 1600 ISO, converted with standard settings through Aperture 2.0, Lightroom 1.3 and Capture NX 1.3, in this order:

Demo6306 Aperture 2.0 Conversion CropDemo6306 Lightroom 1.3 Conversion CropDemo6306 Capture NX 1.3 Conversion Crop

The 100% crops show a nicely even and fine-grained noise background in the sky in the Aperture 2.0 conversions not matched by the LR or NX conversions (at least with standard settings). While not really visible in the crop above, low-contrast detail seems not to suffer as a side-effect of whatever Aperture is doing here, so this definitely seems a win for High-ISO work, like this hand-held shot at nightfall.

The crops above were all taken from the drainage pipe in the upper right of this overall picture of the Ammersee (to the west of Munich) at Nightfall:

Ammersee at Nightfall

Taken with a Nikon D70s, Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 zoom at 10mm, f4 and 1/25s, ISO 1600, hand-held.

First Impressions: Aperture 2.0

| | TrackBacks (0)

So Apple has shipped the long-awaited 2.0 of Aperture, its professional photo-everything app, coinciding with the Mac OS X 10.5.2 update that ushers in (again long-awaited) support for Nikon D3, D300 and Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III.

Having settled on Adobe Lightroom for my photography needs, but cursing its lack of multi-monitor support, and always interested in alternatives, I took a quick peek using the trial version, to see what has changed since Aperture 1.5.

My first impression is that speed has definitely improved since 1.5, especially for GPU-starved computers like my old-but-trusty PowerBook G4 17” 1.5GHz with 2GB RAM. That said, on this computer Lightroom is still a bit snappier for most operations, especially those that trigger a full RAW reconversion, but Aperture is definitely usable, and I’d imagine things to be much better on a more high-end GPU than the old Mobility Radeon 9700 in the PowerBook.

I also definitely like some of the UI-improvements, since to me the old Aperture UI felt a bit over-tweakable and somehow cluttered, whereas out-of-the-box Aperture 2 feels fairly approachable.

The new RAW rendering engine seems faster, and I quite like the output I have seen so far (based on random D70s samples): Especially high-ISO images seem to have less chroma-noise and a more fine-grained appearance to their luminance noise, without loss of detail, compared to Lightroom and Capture NX, yielding a high-ISO film look that looks fairly pleasing. Take this first impression with a ton of salt, though, since I have only looked at a couple of pictures in detail, all of them from my D70s.

There is of course lots more in the new version, compared to Aperture 1.5, and I’ll definitely take a closer look, especially since the price for Aperture 2.0 seems to have dropped again, now to only $199.

I’ll probably post more of my impressions as I get to play more with Aperture 2.0.

Fun with Fish-Eyes

| | TrackBacks (0)

There is most certainly a lot of fun to be had with fish-eye lenses, especially when used to put the observer right into the middle of whatever is happening, something at which both ultra wide-angle lenses as well as fish-eyes excel.

The thing I particularly like about fish-eyes is that they can give a nice rounded-off feeling to the composition, drawing the corners of the image slightly in, like in the following example, which would have been less effective with a normal wide-angle lense.

Bells in Memmingen

This image was captured on a Nikon D70s with the Nikon 10.5mm f2.8 DX fish-eye lense in the pedestrian zone of Memmingen, Germany.

David G. Lowe: Stanford White's New York

| | TrackBacks (0)

Great book by David Garrard Lowe on American architect Stanford White and his influence on the architecture of New York at the turn of the 20th century. Due to its nice layout and great architectural photography, it also makes for a nice coffee table book.

Pages

Categories

Recent Activity

2010-03-26

  • Pierre tweeted, "Note to self: Don't underestimate the pleasure of a hot steam bath after bike practice... Add episode of The Pipeline for maximum enjoyment."

2010-03-11

  • Pierre tweeted, "Ob #Lisp: anyone know why SBCL would not start up on Windows Server 2008? Is Data Execution Prevention the culprit? Is it a known Problem?"
  • Pierre tweeted, "FWIW the unbelievably heavy snow-fall regularly causing havoc again in MUC is something on the order of 3cm over 6h. Siberia is laughing."
  • Pierre tweeted, "Knowing when Winter has dragged on for too long: When you have come to expect not to be able to fly home same day. http://gdzl.la/7JZ3aw"
  • Pierre posted Knowing when Winter has dragged on for too long: When you have come to expect not to be able to fly home same day.

2010-02-21

  • Pierre tweeted, "Seem to have missed the release of Dr. Strangelove on Blu-ray! Enjoy Ken Adam's set designs in HD: http://bit.ly/bJe6iS /via @gruber"
  • Pierre tweeted, "Relistening of Massive Attack collection prompted by The New Yorker review of Heligoland: http://j.mp/aBKpk1 #lazysundays"

2010-01-26

  • Pierre tweeted, "Debugging SSL/TLS session handshake buffering issues between Apache/mod_ssl/openssl and Safari 4: Lots of fun..."

2010-01-24

2010-01-07

  • Pierre tweeted, "Ingenious use of CG by Alex Roman: http://vimeo.com/7809605 (via @chockenberry)"